Submitted by Keith Hammonds on February 1, 2011 - 8:39pm.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5322/b5322804c074472de8214a148811ba9022dfe1ca" alt=""
What's at stake: In the spring of 2008, and then again that autumn, participants in Prachatai’s web boards posted comments critical of Thailand’s monarchy. These lese majeste statements were, the government charged, a violation of the 2007 Computer-Related Offences Commission Act. As editor of Prachatai, Premchaiporn is being held liable for those reader comments, even though Prachatai removed the comments after Thai police requested it do so.
Prechaiporn has been careful not to take sides in Thailand's ongoing political conflict. Unfortunately, balanced coverage and open debate represent a threat to that country's government. As Ashoka's representative in Bangkok, Sinee Chakthranont, has written:
"Prachatai has been called a threat to national security because of its firm public commitment to providing space for diverse information and open debate. During the 2010 demonstrations and the ongoing declaration of State of Emergency, Prachatai online newspaper and Prachatai web board were listed among the 36 websites to be shut down for national security purposes. Mobile phone operators voluntarily revoked Prachatai’s text messaging news service. But readers seemed to seek information from Prachatai more than ever. Chiranuch has altered Prachatai’s web address five times, leading government censors on a cat-and-mouse chase, as a public statement that freedom of expression will not be easily contained on the Internet. She has also publicized tools for users to circumvent blocks, in addition to creating alternative ways to access and contribute to Prachatai news through online social networks like Facebook and Twitter, which are more difficult to censor in Thailand."
Photo @jiew, courtesy pittaya / CC BY
Via: http://knowledge.ashoka.org/node/4977
No comments:
Post a Comment